- Adaptive Enterprise
Welcome to our blog. This is an archived post, most of our knowledge and advice remain valid but some material or links may be outdated. Click here to see our most recent posts.
This is the sixth posting in a series on architecture standards. In previous postings we discussed the standards terminology, the documentation of architecture standards as well as the embedding in the organization and the life cycle of architecture standards. In this posting we pick up the thread and dive into the governance of standards.
Architecture standards can be incredibly valuable, if they are properly managed and used in practice. This may seem obvious, but unfortunately we have seen several cases in practice where organizations develop a (large) body of standards and fail to manage and use it properly. Over time the standards base gets outdated, degrades, and loses its value at which point it will sit on a shelf collecting dust.
From this analysis, we learn that processes related to keeping the standards body up to date and processes related to governing the use of standards are two sides of the same coin. Both must be in place if we strive for effective standards management.
Keeping the standards body fresh, active, and up to date sounds simpler than it really is. At first glance, it may seem that all we have to do is to make sure that standards get a periodic review, and make sure that we have some mechanism in place to receive feedback from others on their usefulness in practice. There is, however, more to it than that. Here are some typical things to worry about based on our work in several organizations:
Our experience is that a simple approach, in line with the TOGAF practice, tends to work best in this respect. In this approach we distinguish a number of roles in the standards management practice:
One other thing should be mentioned here: developing and maintaining standards take time. It is not something that typically can be done “in between other jobs”. As such, work related to standards should be managed as mini projects with proper time codes, delivery and so on.
In theory, standards are developed as best practices and people want to follow them because they make sense. In many cases this is indeed the case. We have seen several examples where standards around complex security services were followed automatically by everyone in the organization because they made so much sense: figuring out other ways to implement security requirements that are covered by the standard would just take too much time and hassle and thus no one bothered to do so.
In other cases, though, we see the exact opposite. Unfortunately this typically tends to be the case with standardized technology. Exaggerating slightly: it appears that every project wants to reinvent the wheel and bring its own specific new and cool toys into the organization rather than using the standard. We have seen cases where organizations have several different database platforms, ETL tools, and even ESB’s leading to a dispersed landscape as well as high cost around licensing and maintenance.
The key to success in this area is to make sure that everyone in the organization understands that standards management only makes sense if we maximize the return on investment by actually following them. This may require a lot of evangelizing and collecting of hard data. In the end it is worth it! Eventually the goal should be to make sure that following standards is second nature for all key stakeholders (sponsors, project managers, business owners and so on), while still taking into account that exceptions to the rule do occur in practice!
There are also several practical things that can be done to be successful in this area:
Last but not least, a few tips on getting started with standards management. First of all, experience shows that it is best to “think big but start small”. Start in a small area and start showing value, building the standards practice as you move along. Indeed, it seems that IT standards may be a good place to start. Get an architecture board in place as soon as possible. This will improve visibility of the initiative and provides a good linking pin to the rest of the organization. Last but not least: communication is a key ingredient of being successful.
If you’d like to know more, please leave a comment. The next post wraps up this series on standards management. It is scheduled to be posted on the 2nd of April 2012.